تحلیل گفتمان انتقادی فیلم «درخت گردو» براساس نظریه لاکلا و موف

1. Hajer MA. The Politics of Environmental Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995.

2. Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis. Tehran: Media Studies and Planning Office; 2012.

3. Yārmoḥammadī L. Discourse Analysis Using the Socio-Semantic Components of Discourse with Attention to the Visualization of Social Agents. Journal of the Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. 2002;10(8):105-21.

4. Laclau E, Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Toward a radical democratic politics. London: Verso; 1985.

5. Moqaddamī MT. Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Analysis Theory and its Critique. Socio-Cultural Knowledge Quarterly. 2011;2(6):91-124.

6. Āhangar AA, Khoshkhūnezhād AA, Khādemī S. Representation of Social Discourses in the Film The Cow Based on the Laclau and Mouffe Approach. Social Linguistics Quarterly. 2021;4(4):71-82.

7. Al-Ṭā'ī A. Ethnic Identity Crisis in Iran. Tehran: Āgāh; 2017.

8. Fairclough N, Wodak R. Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. 1997;2(1):258-84.

9. Jorgensen M, Philips L. Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Sage; 2002.

10. Fairclough N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman; 1995.

11. Fairclough N. Analysing Discourse. London: Routledge; 2001.

12. Kasrā'ī MS, Pūrshīrāzī A. Laclau and Mouffe's Discourse Theory: An Efficient Tool for Understanding and Explaining Political Phenomena. Siyāsat (Politics) Quarterly. 2009;3(3):339-60.

13. Nash K. Contemporary Sociology: Globalization, Politics, and Power. Tehran: Kavīr; 2019.

14. Solṭānī SAA. Power, Discourse, and Language: Mechanisms of Power Flow in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Tehran: Ney; 2008.

15. Mīrzā'ī M, Rabbānī Khūrāshgānī A. Discursive Confrontation Analysis of Principlism and Reformism in the 10th Presidential Election. Applied Sociology. 2015;26(4):45-68.

16. Marsh D, Stoker G. Theory and Methods in Political Science. Tehran: Strategic Studies Research Institute; 2020.

17. De-Vos P. Discourse theory and the study of ideological (trance) - formation: Analyzing social democratic revisionism. Journal of Pragmatics. 2003;13(1):163-80.

18. Ḥoseini-Zādeh MA. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis. Political Science. 2004;7(28):181-212.

19. Kīā AA, Sa'īdī R. Foundations of Communication, Propaganda, and Persuasion. Tehran: Iran Newspaper Publishing Institute; 2004.

20. Ghavām SA, Asadī M. Comparative Study of the Status of Women in Various Discourses of Contemporary Iranian History. Intercultural Studies. 2014;9(23):9-42.

21. Bukhārā'ī A, Alīkhwāh F, Nabātī Shāghel A. Analysis of the Female Subject in the Discursive Space of Iranian Cinema with a Case Discourse Analysis of the Films Leila, Two Women, and A Separation. Woman in Culture and Art. 2015;1(7):17-36.

22. Rāvdarad A, Āghā'ī Ā. Discourse Analysis of the Representation of AIDS in Iranian Cinema: Case Study of the Film Barefoot in Paradise. Cultural and Communication Studies. 2016;12(45):69-95.

23. Āhangar AA, Khoshkhūnezhād AA, Khādemī S. A Critical Study of the Socio-Cultural Components of the Film The Salesman Based on the Laclau and Mouffe Model. Global Media Journal. 2019;14(2):22-52.

24. Nīāzī M, Helālī Sutūdeh M, Ẕiyā'ī M, Omīdī Z. Representation of the Role of Media Discourse in the Display of Disability in the Film A Light Shines Here Consistent with the Laclau and Mouffe Analytical Approach. Ormazd Research Journal. 2023;5(62):83-112.