Minimal and Maximal Ghazal and Their Comparison with the Characteristics of the Minimalist School

Authors

    Esmael Aghajani PhD student, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Ar.C., Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
    Mohsen Izadyar * Department of Persian Language and Literature, Ar.C., Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran. m-izadyar@iau-arak.ac.ir
    Fatemeh Ghahremani Department of Persian Language and Literature, Ar.C., Islamic Azad University, Arak, Iran.
https://doi.org/10.61838/jtpll.237

Keywords:

Minimal ghazal, maximal ghazal, minimalism school, modern ghazal

Abstract

The transformations of the modern world in art, literature, poetry, and the ghazal—the national poetic form of Iran—have brought about significant shifts. Attention to the issue of meta-form and its subcategories, including maximal and minimal ghazals, represents one of the neo-formal developments in contemporary ghazal poetry. Both types of ghazal are word-centered and grounded in a belief in the word–human relationship. In both forms, changes have emerged in form, content, language, and structure. The maximal ghazal, in its movement toward becoming increasingly word-centered, has drawn upon the tools of narrative fiction, philosophical prose, drama, and other genres, generating through inter-generic synergy a unified text. It is a polyphonic ghazal in which each character possesses its own distinct voice, yet all serve the integrity of the whole. The minimal ghazal draws upon the mental forms of the fragment, quatrain, allegorical ghazal, volumetric ghazal, documentary ghazal, and the cut-section ghazal. It is transparent, with bare vocabulary, and characterized by minimal use of literary devices and rhetorical embellishments. By employing characteristics of maximalism and minimalism in art, these two types of ghazal have managed to establish an independent style of composition, and some contemporary poets, in response to individual developments and societal changes, experiment with both forms. This dual mode of composition can be considered a sign of balance in today’s ghazal and of preserving the maximal aesthetic integrity of the genre.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kiyan M. Thursday, August 18th; Revised (2023). 2011.

2. Azadbakht F. The Other: An Analytical Study of Contemporary Iranian Poetry Movements from 1981 to 20112017.

3. Nowruzali Z. Anthology of Iranian Language Writers2021.

4. Azarpayk A. The Maiden Returns to Love2018.

5. Masiḥ N. Realistic Critique of Society in the Lyrical Context of Minimal Ghazal and Discourse. Maktab-e Aṣalat-e Kalameh Website. 2021.

6. Barahani R. Gold in Copper1998.

7. Azarpayk A. Shaykh al-Ishraq Falls in Love2020.

8. Moḥammadi Ḥ. Literary Foundations of Orianism (The Literary Doctrines of Arash Azarpayk in the School of Orianism from 1997 to 2021)2021.

9. Ḥaydari N. Innovations in the Mental Form of "Form Ghazal" and "Minimal Ghazal". 2022;1(1).

10. Azarpayk A. The Maximal Ghazal Manifesto2020.

11. Azarpayk A. A Glance at Maximal Ghazal. Farazaman Electronic Publication. 2020;4(4):28-32.

12. Ḥasanli K. Types of Innovation in Contemporary Iranian Poetry2012.

13. Qajar M. Minimalism versus Maximalism: Differences, Similarities, and Uses. 2022.

14. Azarpayk A, Ahura H, Masiḥ N. Yalda's Eyes and the Keyword of the Holographic World. 2017.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-22

Submitted

2025-07-08

Revised

2025-11-17

Accepted

2025-11-22

Issue

Section

مقالات

How to Cite

Aghajani, E. ., Izadyar, M., & Ghahremani, F. . (1404). Minimal and Maximal Ghazal and Their Comparison with the Characteristics of the Minimalist School. Treasury of Persian Language and Literature, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.61838/jtpll.237

Similar Articles

1-10 of 42

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.